Adaptation & resilience

Climate adaptation and resilient supply chains

Decarbonisation and resilience belong in the same business conversation, alongside water stewardship and deforestation.

A credible climate strategy must address the emissions a supply chain creates and the environmental pressures it faces. Purchasing decisions, supplier relationships and investment in adaptation all have a part to play.

Water and forests are part of that picture. Water stress can affect production and continuity; commodity sourcing connects businesses with deforestation and wider environmental exposure. Supplier engagement brings these issues into commercial relationships, where expectations, support and incentives can shape action.

These questions run through my work: a coauthored water-stewardship abstract in 2014, CDP’s work with BSR on climate-resilient supply chains, our expansion into forests and my writing on business preparedness. At EcoVadis, I bring that perspective to supplier action and reliable information.

Understanding a risk is the beginning. Suppliers need useful feedback, resources and access to finance if they are to respond. Cutting emissions and preparing for disruption both depend on those relationships.

Ask about both impact and exposure

Emissions reduction addresses a business’s contribution to climate change. Adaptation addresses its ability to respond to changing conditions. A supplier can make progress on one while remaining exposed on the other. Put both questions into the business review and make the objectives explicit.

Look beyond a single carbon indicator

Ask where production depends on water, land and functioning ecosystems, and which sourcing relationships need a closer look. A global supplier score is a starting point for that conversation; the relevant location, commodity and business dependency determine what information the buyer needs next.

Build capacity into the purchasing relationship

Once a priority risk is understood, discuss what can change: supplier capability, sourcing choices, continuity planning, commercial terms or investment. Assign responsibility on both sides. The objective is a relationship that supports emissions reduction and strengthens the capacity to respond to disruption.

Watch on YouTube

Playing loads YouTube. You can also open the original recording above.

Questions for leadership

  1. Where are our suppliers exposed to climate, water and forest-related risks?
  2. What support and investment would help them reduce impacts and adapt?
  3. How do purchasing and financing decisions reinforce long-term resilience?

The evidence behind the discussion

This perspective draws on my programme leadership, partnerships and published work. The sources above provide the evidence and context.

Mitigation & adaptation
A continuing argument

Water stewardship

Use purchasing power to address water risk.

A conference abstract coauthored with Cate Lamb at World Water Week examined how supplier transparency and procurement can strengthen water stewardship and business resilience.

World Water Week · Coauthored abstract, pp. 103–104
Deforestation

Make forests a supply-chain responsibility.

When we expanded CDP Supply Chain into forests, I argued that buyers and suppliers needed to act together. Commodity sourcing connects a company to environmental risks far beyond its own operations.

CDP / Climate Action · Programme announcement

My post-COP30 article on Scope 3, adaptation & resilience · ESG Today, December 2025

EcoVadis World Tour 2025: Climate Action in an Age of Uncertainty, with Dexter Galvin

Climate action in an age of uncertainty.

My EcoVadis World Tour conversation, 2025.

Watch the session Image & recording: EcoVadis

More writing
& conversations

Browse the archive